home
arrow_back
back
fwd
arrow_forward
play_circle_filled
pause
< Previous
|
Contents
|
Next >
JUDICIARY- HIGH COURT, SUBORDINATE COURTS, ISSUES, JUDICIAL REFORMS AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM
Contents
1. High Court
1.1. Organization of High Court
1.2. Eligibility Criteria for High Court Judges
1.3. Tenure of Judges
1.4. Appointment of Judges
Regular Judges (Art. 217(1))
Acting Chief Justice (Art. 223)
Additional and Acting Judges (Art. 224)
Retired Judges (Art.224A)
1.5. Oath
1.6. Salaries of Judges
1.7. Removal of Judges
1.8. Transfer of Judges
1.9. Jurisdiction and Powers of High Court
1.9.1. Original Jurisdiction
1.9.2. Writ Jurisdiction
1.9.3. Appellate Jurisdiction
1.9.4. Power of Superintendence
1.9.5. A Court of Record
1.9.6. Power of Judicial Review (Art. 13 and Art. 226)
2. Subordinate Courts
Appointment of District Judges (Art.233)
Appointment of other Judges (Art.234)
Control over Subordinate Courts (Art.235)
Structure and Jurisdiction
2.1.1. Structure
2.1.2. Jurisdiction
2.1.3. Procedure followed by Gram Nyayalayas
2.1.4. Appeal against the decision of Nyayalayas
2.1.5. Issue with Gram Nyayalayas
2.2. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
2.2.1. Tools of Alternative Dispute Redressal
2.2.2. Advantages of ADRs
2.2.3. Disadvantages of ADRs
2.2.4. High Level Committee on institutionalization of arbitration
3. The National Legal Services Authority
3. To organize legal awareness camps in the rural areas.
4. Lok Adalats
4.1. Levels of Lok Adalat
4.2. Types of Lok Adalat
4.3. Criticism of Lok Adalats
5. Fast Track Courts (FTCs)
These are additional Session Courts set up for speeding up the trials of long pending cases, particularly those involving under trials.
6. Commercial Courts
6.1. Key features of the 2015 Act
6.2. Significance
6.3. Issues
♤ Vagueness
♤ Exclusion
6.4. The 2018 Amendment to the Act
7. All India Judicial Service (AIJS)
7.1. Historical background
7.2. Rationale for AIJS
7.3. Arguments against AIJS
8. Judicial Activism and Judicial Overreach
8.1. Difference between Judicial Activism and Judicial Overreach
What did the Supreme Court say in its recent judgment?
Way Forward
8.2. Examples of Judicial Activism in India
8.2.1. Persons in custody to be debarred from contesting elections
8.2.2. MPs, MLAs to be Disqualified on Date of Criminal Conviction
8.2.3. SC Ruling on Appointments in Central Information Commission
8.2.4. Supreme Court’s Ruling on Fixed Tenure for Bureaucrats
8.2.5. Voter’s right to cast negative vote
8.2.6. The VVPAT Ruling
8.2.7. Ruling on Election Manifesto
8.2.8. Stay on Caste-Based Rallies in UP
8.2.9. Ruling on Nomination Papers
8.2.10. Judgment on Commutation of Death Sentence
8.2.11. Supreme Court’s Ruling on Acid Sale
8.2.12. Interlinking of Rivers
8.2.13. Earlier Cases of Judicial Activism
9. Comparison between the Supreme Court and High Court
2019
Ans. (d)
Ans. (b)
Ans. (c)
Ans. (b)
Ans. (a)
Ans. (d)
Ans. (d)
Ans. (a)
Ans (c)
2003
Ans. (b)
Ans. (a)
Ans. (b)
12. Previous Year GS Mains Questions
1. Examine the need of ADR mechanisms in India and comment on their efficacy in dispute redressal.
Answer:
2. Elaborate the functions and structure of Nyaya Panchayats. Also discuss how it works at the grass-root level for the dispensation of justice.
Answer:
3. If the Supreme Court and the High Courts both were to be thought of as brothers in the administration of justice, the High Court has a larger jurisdiction but the Supreme Court still remains the elder brother. -Justice R.C Lahoti. In the context of the above statements describe the relationship between the apex court and the high courts in India.
Answer:
4. Give an account of the factors responsible for the limited success of Lok Adalats. What measures are required to ensure that Lok Adalats function as an effective dispute redressal mechanism?
Answer:
5. Centralising recruitment through an All-India Judicial Service (AIJS) will not address the multiple problems in the judiciary and cause new ones instead. Critically evaluate.
Answer:
1. Concept of Federalism
1.1. Federalism in India
Unitary Features:
2. Federal Structure
2.1. Union State Legislative Relations (Arts. 245 to255)
2.2. Administrative Relations (Arts. 256 to263)
2.3. Financial Relations (Art.268 to Art.293)
2.4. Trends in Centre-State relations
2.5. Miscellaneous Issues
3. UPSC Prelims Questions
4. UPSC GS Mains Questions
Federalism/Union State Relations
5. GS Mains Test Series Questions
1. “Modern Indian federalism owes its origin to the dual legacies of colonial administration and structure of Indian society.” Elaborate.
2. What are the provisions of Inter State Council as mentioned in the Constitution. Have such Councils been helpful in maintaining the solidarity among the States?
3. Economic and financial reforms have huge bearing on Centre – state relations. Discuss the statement in the light of economic and financial reformative measures initiated in last two decades.
Answer:
4. Assess the effectiveness of the institutional architecture of Indian federalism in settling inter-state disputes.
Answer:
Existing institutional architecture of India federalism in settling inter-state disputes
The effectiveness of the institutional architecture of India federalism in settling inter- state disputes:
Special provisions under the Indian Constitution:
Part 2
Part 3
Answer:
Centralised Planning:
Objectives
Performance of NITI Aayog Achievements:
Shortcomings/Criticism:
Measures to make NITI Aayog more effective
Structure of NITI Aayog:
Functions of NITI Aayog:
Relevance of NITI Aayog in contemporary time:
Economic decentralization
Control over political management
Structural Issues
< Previous
|
Contents
|
Next >