GS IAS Logo

< Previous | Contents | Next >

8.2.5. Voter’s right to cast negative vote

With a view to bring about purity in elections, the Supreme Court held that a voter could exercise the option of negative voting and reject all candidates as unworthy of being elected. The voter could press the ‘None of the Above’ (NOTA) button in the electronic voting machine. The Court directed the Election Commission to provide the NOTA button in the EVM.

The NOTA option would indeed compel political parties to nominate sound candidates. The bench noted that giving right to a voter to not vote for any candidate, while protecting his right of secrecy is extremely important in a democracy. Such an option gives the voter the right to express his disapproval to the kind of candidates being put up by the Political Parties. Gradually, there will be a systemic change and the Parties will be forced to accept the will of the people and field candidates who are known for their integrity.

The right to cast a negative vote will foster the purity of the electoral process and also fulfill one of its objectives, namely, wide participation of people. Not allowing a person to cast a negative vote defeats the freedom of expression and the right to liberty.

The Bench held that Election Conduct Rules 41(2) and (3) and 49-O of the Rules were ultra vires Section 128 of the Representation of the People Act and Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution to the extent they violate the secrecy of voting.