< Previous | Contents | Next >
Answer:
The relationship between the Supreme Court and High court in the constitutional scheme of things includes independence and hierarchy both. There are provisions
which give an edge, and assign a superior place in the hierarchy, to Supreme Court over High Courts. For instance,
♤ Article 139-A empowers the Apex Court to transfer any case pending before one High Court to another High Court or may withdraw the case to itself.
♤ Article 141 makes the law declared by the Supreme Court binding on all courts, including High Courts, within the territory of India. And
♤ Article 144 mandates that all authorities, civil and judicial, in the territory of India
— and that would include High Court as well — shall act in aid of the Supreme Court.
The cases involving the interpretation of the Constitution are decided only by the Supreme Court, while the cases of constitutional interpretation cannot be decided by the High courts, the High Court issues the certificates that the cases require constitutional interpretations and should be taken by the Supreme court. The Constitutional provisions that attest to a larger jurisdiction of High Court are:
♤ Under Article 226 regarding writ jurisdiction the high court has wider powers than the Supreme Court. However, power conferred on a High Court by this article shall not be in derogation of the power conferred on the Supreme court by clause ( 2 ) of Article 32.
♤ Article 227 of the Constitution confers on every High Court the power of superintendence over all courts and tribunals throughout the territories in relation to which it exercises jurisdiction excepting any court or tribunal constituted by or under any law relating to the armed forces.
The Supreme Courts apex status in judicial matters is further affirmed by the Article 136 which provides an extraordinary jurisdiction to it. However, the Constitution has clearly divided the jurisdiction between these two institutions in exercise of their constitutional mandate but while doing so these institutions have to have mutual respect for each other as was observed Justice Lahoti by in the Tirupati Balaji Developers Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Vs. State of Bihar Case 2003.