< Previous | Contents | Next >
2.2.3. Disadvantages of ADRs
♤ There is no guaranteed resolution. With the exception of arbitration, alternative dispute resolution processes do not always lead to a resolution and still ends up having to proceed with litigation.
♤ The finality and binding nature of an arbitrator’s decision can sometimes be viewed as a disadvantage because it may not always please the parties and courts will often refuse to review it.
♤ The neutral party – arbitrator, mediator, conciliator, will charge a fee for their time and expertise and depending on their popularity, these fees may be substantial. A judge, on the other hand, charges no fee for his decision.
♤ Non-binding arbitration. Sometimes the court may order nonbinding or Judicial Arbitration. This means that if a party is not satisfied with the decision of the arbitrator, they can file a request for trial with the court within a specified time period after the arbitration award. Depending on the process ordered, if that party does not receive a more favorable result at trial, they may have to pay a penalty or fees to the other side.