Approach:

♤ First discuss the statement of the question. Is it justified? A preferable way of answering would be to consider that the statement holds good. If you negate the statement, the second part of the question will not hold much relevance.

♤ Also give arguments in support of the stand that you are taking. Here you can also discuss the requirement that a constitution should be dynamic in nature. However, the requirement that changes should not be too frequent, also needs to be discussed.

♤ Then discuss whether amendments in the Indian Constitution will pass the test of the statement (while discussing this, you have to assume that the statement holds good.)

♤ Also, provide examples of some constitutional amendments and discuss whether changes have been too frequent, or only when situations arose that made these inevitable.