< Previous | Contents | Next >
3. Comparison between Judicial Process and various ADR process
Judicial Process | Arbitration | Mediation | ||
An where | adjudicatory a third | process party | A quasi-judicial adjudicatory process where the | A negotiation process and not an adjudicatory process. The |
(judge/other authority) decides the outcome | arbitrator(s) appointed by the Court or by the parties decide the dispute between the parties | mediator facilitates the process. Parties participate directly in the resolution of their dispute and decide the terms of settlement. |
Procedure and decision are governed, restricted, and controlled by the provisions of the relevant statutes. | Procedure and decision are governed, restricted and controlled by the provisions of the Arbitration & Conciliation, 1996. | Procedure and settlement are not controlled, governed or restricted by statutory provisions thereby allowing freedom and flexibility. |
The decision is binding on the parties. | The award in an arbitration is binding on the parties. | A binding settlement is reached only if parties arrive at a mutually acceptable agreement. |
Personal appearance or active participation of parties is not always required. | Personal appearance or active participation of parties is not always required. | Personal appearance and active participation of the parties are required. |
A formal proceeding held in public and follows strict procedural stages. | A formal proceeding held in private following strict procedural stages. | A non-judicial and informal proceeding held in private with flexible procedural stages. |
Decision is appealable | Award is subject to challenge on specified grounds. | Decree/Order in terms of the settlement is final and is not appealable |
Mediation | Conciliation | Lok Adalat | ||
Voluntary process | Voluntary process | Voluntary process | ||
Mediator is a neutral third party. | Conciliator is a party. Presiding neutral third party. | neutral officer | third is a | Conciliator is a neutral third party. Presiding officer is a neutral third party. |
Service of lawyer is available | Service of lawyer is available | Service of lawyer is available | ||
The function of the Mediator is mainly facilitative. | The function of the conciliator is more active than the facilitative function of the mediator. | The function of the Presiding Officer is persuasive. | ||
The consent of the parties is not mandatory for referring a case to mediation. | The consent of the parties is mandatory for referring a case to conciliation. | The consent of the parties is not mandatory for referring a case to Lok Adalat. | ||
Regulated by Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 | Regulated by Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 | Regulated by Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 | ||
Not appealable. | Decree/order not appealable. | Award not appealable | ||
parties are actively and directly involved. | parties are actively and directly involved. | parties are not actively and directly involved so much | ||
Confidentiality is the essence | Confidentiality is the essence | Confidentiality is not observed |
4. Conclusion
Apart from the above mentioned Dispute Resolution Mechanisms, there are several Constitutional and statutory institutions which look into complaints filed by citizens such as National Human Rights Commission, National Commission for Women, National Commission for SC, National Commission for ST, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission etc. which are covered in other documents. (Refer – Constitutional Bodies, Statutory bodies and Quasi-Judicial Bodies document). These are all institutions constituted for providing special focus on redressing the grievances of specific sections of society