GS IAS Logo

< Previous | Contents | Next >

On Power of Union to give directions to State

Though States have raised objections to the power exercisable by the Union under Articles 256 and 257 on the ground that they are destructive of not only the autonomy of States but also inimical to the very foundation of a federal arrangement but this is no case for amendment of these provisions. It must, however, be clarified that favouring the retention of these provisions is entirely different from advocating easy or quick resort to them. Articles 256 and 257 may be viewed as a safety valve, one which may never come into play but which is nevertheless required to be retained.

The above view is substantiated by recent experiences where the Centre had to give directions on containing communal violence or insurgency in certain areas. The question that remains is about the consequence of non-compliance by a State of the Centres' directions in this regard. Though the Constitution has not provided any explicit course of action to such an eventuality, the obvious answer appears to be recourse available under Article 356 which indeed is an extreme step. In the existing scheme of things such a development is unlikely to happen which may explain why the Constitution makers avoided making remedial provision. Healthy conventions respecting the autonomy of states and restrained use of the power on behalf of the Union can go a long way to address the concern expressed by States in this regard. Another related issue is about the term 'existing laws" used in Article 256 which are in addition to laws made by Parliament to which the executive power of State shall ensure compliance. These relate to other laws including Presidential Ordinances and international treaties and customary international law applicable to the State concerned. Rule of Law demands executive compliance of all laws.

A question is raised whether the scope of Article 257 Clause (3) should be widened besides railways to include other vital installations like major dams, space stations, nuclear installations, communication centres etc. The executive power of the Union shall also extend to the giving of directions to a State as to the measures to be taken for the protection of Union property declared by the Union Government to be of national importance thus clause (3) of Art.257 should accordingly be amended to incorporate them.