GS IAS Logo

< Previous | Contents | Next >

Arguments against Contempt of Court

Contempt of Court proceedings have the effect of muzzling free speech guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution.

Article 19(2) includes ‘contempt of court’ as a reasonable restriction on free speech but its

justification in its present form is not tenable in a democracy.

Pandit Thakur Das Bhargava in the Constituent Assembly said that powers to reprimand contempt concerned only actions such as the disobedience of an order or direction of a court, which were already punishable infractions.

Speech in criticism of the courts, ought not to be considered as contumacious, for it would simply open up the possibility of gross judicial abuse of such powers; which has now been proved true in many instances.

Interestingly, in England, whose laws of contempt we have adopted, there hasn’t been a

single conviction for scandalizing the court in more than eight decades.