< Previous | Contents | Next >
1.9. Criticism of Second Chamber in States
♤ Plays Superfluous and obstructive Role: If a majority of the members in the upper house belong to the same party, which holds majority in the lower house, the upper house will become a mere ditto chamber. If on the other hand, two different parties are holding sway in the two Houses, the upper house will delay the bills for four months unnecessarily.
♤ Not an effective check: Powers of the Legislative Councils are limited to the extent that they can hardly impose any effective check on the Assemblies.
♤ Stronghold of vested interests: It serves as stronghold of vested interests, who are not expected to support progressive legislation. Instead they may block such legislation initiated by popularly elected Legislative Assembly.
♤ Backdoor entry of defeated members: It is utilized to accommodate discredited party-men who may not be able to return to Assemblies through popular votes. The nominated quota placed in the hands of Governor may be used for enabling these defeated leaders to seek nomination to the Council and even their elevation to the Chief Minister ship.
♤ Costly institution: It is a big drain on the State’s exchequer. In the Punjab Vidhan Sabha, the Vidhan Parishad was described as a superfluous luxury. In West Bengal also one of the main reasons for its abolition was stated as unnecessary burden on the State exchequer.
♤ Utility doubtful: Critics point out that the very fact that some of the States, such as Punjab, Bihar and West Bengal decided to wind up bicameral legislatures goes to prove that second chambers have doubtful utility. The provision for their abolition in the Constitution itself further confirms that even the Constituent Assembly was doubtful about the utility of these chambers.
♤ Heterogeneity: A blend of direct election, indirect election and nomination makes the Council a hotchpotch of representation. A chamber so heterogeneously constituted, neither serves the purpose of a revisory chamber nor acts as an effective brake against hasty legislation.