GS IAS Logo

< Previous | Contents | Next >

The Charter Act of 1833

The lease of 20 years to the Company was further extended. Territories of India were to be governed in the name of the Crown.

The Company’s monopoly over trade with China and in tea also ended.

All restrictions on European immigration and the acquisition of property in India were lifted. Thus, the way was paved for the wholesale European colonisation of India.

In India, a financial, legislative and administrative centralisation of the government was envisaged:

— The governor-general was given the power to superintend, control and direct all civil and military affairs of the Company.

— Bengal, Madras, Bombay and all other territories were placed under complete control of the governor-general.

— All revenues were to be raised under the authority of the governor-general who would have complete control over the expenditure too.

— The Governments of Madras and Bombay were drastically deprived of their legislative powers and left with a right of proposing to the governor-general the projects of law which they thought to be expedient.

A law member was added to the governor-general’s council for professional advice on law-making.

Indian laws were to be codified and consolidated.

No Indian citizen was to be denied employment under the Company on the basis of religion, colour, birth, descent, etc. (Although the reality was different, this declaration formed the sheet-anchor of political agitation in India.)

The administration was urged to take steps to ameliorate the conditions of slaves and to ultimately abolish slavery. (Slavery was abolished in 1843.)