GS IAS Logo

< Previous | Contents | Next >

Characteristics of Tribal Revolts

There were some common characteristics of the tribal uprisings even though they were separated from one another

in time and space.

Tribal identity or ethnic ties lay behind the solidarity shown by these groups. Not all ‘outsiders’ were, however, seen as enemies: the poor who lived by their manual labour or profession and had a socially/economically supportive role in the village were left alone; the violence was directed towards the money-lenders and traders who were seen as extensions of the colonial government.

A common cause was the resentment against the imposition of laws by the ‘foreign government’ that was seen as an effort at destroying the tribals’ traditional socio- economic framework.

Many uprisings were led by messiah-like figures who encouraged their people to revolt and who held out the promise that they could end their suffering brought about by the ‘outsiders’.

The tribal uprisings were doomed from the beginning, given the outdated arms they fought with as against the modern weapons and techniques used by their opponents.

Important Tribal Movements of Mainland Some important tribal movements are discussed below. It may be noted that most tribal movements, if we leave out the frontier tribal areas, were concentrated in central India, the west-central region and the south.

 

Pahariyas’ RebellionChuar UprisingKol Mutiny (1831)Ho and Munda Uprisings (1820-1837)The Santhal Rebellion (1855-56)Khond Uprisings (1837-1856)Koya RevoltsBhil RevoltsKoli RisingsRamosi Risings