< Previous | Contents | Next >
♤ Absence of legal backing to charters. The Citizen’s Charter is not legally enforceable and,
therefore, is non-justiciable.
♤ Poor design and content: Critical information that end users need to hold agencies accountable are missing in charters.
♤ Lack of consultation: End-users and NGOs are not consulted when Charters are drafted.
♤ Inadequate groundwork: Non-familiarity of the service providers with the philosophy, goals and main features of charters.
♤ Lack of public awareness: Effective efforts of communicating and educating the public about the standards of delivery have not been undertaken.
♤ Resistance to change: Vested interests work for stalling the Citizens’ Charter altogether or
in making it toothless.
♤ Lack of review: The review and updation exercise of charters have been very poor.
♤ The needs of senior citizens and other special categories including differently abled has largely not been factored in charter exercise.
♤ Charters haven not been prepared in vernaculars.
♤ Details of public grievance officer are not provided in many charters.