GS IAS Logo

< Previous | Contents | Next >

o India had unilaterally terminated BITs with most EU members in 2017, asking them to renegotiate the treaty based on a new model BIT passed by the Cabinet in December 2015.

o The Indian Model BIT requires a foreign investor to litigate in national courts for at least five years before approaching an international tribunal.

o On the other hand, the ISDS provision in EU-Singapore FTA (2013), the gives investors a choice between bringing a dispute against a host state before the national court of the country where the investment has been made and submitting the dispute to international arbitration.

o Rejecting a proposal by EU to suspend such termination, India proposed a toned- down version of the BTIA, which would include an investment chapter and avoid contentious issues for the time being.

o However, the EU didn’t agree. The issue came up for discussion again during the meeting of the two chief trade negotiators.

At the 14th India-EU Summit in Delhi in October 2017, both sides resolved to restart negotiations for BTIA.

After months of deadlock, India and the European Union (EU) chief trade negotiators met in New Delhi in November 2017 to hammer out a way forward for the long-pending free trade agreement negotiations between the two sides. It is not the resumption of BTIA negotiations, but to find a way forward to resume negotiations.

2.6.1. The India-Meeting on BTIA Talks: Recent Developments

On 15 November 2017, senior officials of India and European Union (EU) held discussions on the long-stalled free trade pact and expressed willingness to address issues in a time- bound manner.

The negotiations for the pact have been held up since May 2013 as both the sides are yet to bridge substantial gaps on crucial issues such as: